I have often wondered how the choice of the European City of Culture is made and by whom. Sometimes I really wonder about the choice.
Today Kosice in eastern Slovakia takes its turn centre stage for a year. It’s the second largest city in Slovakia and I haven’t visited it myself, but it seems to have quite a few things going for it.
But this year the title is shared between two cities and the other one is Marseille. Marseille is not a city I like, particularly its over-ornate basilica, Notre Dame de la Garde. There is a new Museum of the Mediterranean being built for this year of glory, but it won’t be finished till June at the earliest, half-way through its reign. Over the past year Marseille has become notorious for murders, usually one lot of drug-dealers taking out a rival bunch. No loss there! But is it really a good idea to have a lot of visitors coming to a place where drive-by shootings have become the norm? Some of the local people are hopeful that the culture accolade will improve the town’s image,
” De quoi, espèrent en choeur les Marseillais, corriger l’image de la ville, particulièrement mise à mal ces derniers mois après une série de règlements de comptes.”
Would it not have been better to postpone this City of Culture title for Marseille for a bit, until the new museum was fully open and the police and gendarmes have managed to clear up some of the drugs racket though that will take a while, since corruption has eaten its way into some of the forces of law and order? The North African ferries continue to unload their cargo of HGVs, many of them with hidden extras. So who on earth thought it would be a good idea to nominate Marseille in the first place and to carry on regardless in the second?
You must be logged in to post a comment.