Why do so many Politians have a problem with defining what a woman is? I’m pretty sure that they would have no problem with defining what a man is.
So why do they stutter and stammer when they are asked to define ‘a woman’?
Well first of all they might like to remember that approximately 50% of the human race are born with XX chromosones, with female genitalia and the ability to incubate another generation.
Men are born with XY chromosones, with male genitalia and, apart from a one-off action, have little to do with furthering the survival of the human race.
And no amount of later intervention can change the XX and XY chromosones. We are what we are – however much the medical proffession changes our bodies.
These ‘politicians’ and mainly-male-trans-right activists might also like to recall that it isn’t until a feotus is 6 weeks old that the Y chromosone kicks in to turn a feotus into male…
… as one (male) genetisist I read said: “men are simple genetically modified women”.
What a devastating thought that must be to those males who for centuries have thought they are the ‘Kings of Creation’ and have treated women as second-class citizens.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t care if men want to live their lives as women or vice versa.
But I do mind if people with XY chromosones assert that they should be treated exactly the same as those of us with XX chromosones just because they ‘think’ they are female.
A lot of people ‘think’ they are aliens, or Napolean Bonaparte – how long will it be before we must all affirm their fantasies?
You must be logged in to post a comment.