The Lunatics have taken over the Asylum

We are to build two aircraft carriers – and no aircraft for them to carry.

We are to spend one billion pounds on capturing carbon from the atmosphere and burying it. This is to add to the megatons of carbon already buried there – which, btw, we could use to produce real, usable energy instead of spending further untold billions on useless windmills which our ancestors gave up a couple of hundred years ago as soon as something better came along.

We are to be taxed to the point of agony – but still continue sending money to line the pockets of corrupt third world thieves politicians, fat-cat Brussels thieves bureacrats and inefficient French thieves farmers while building a two-hundred and fifty million pound palce for an obscure Belgian bureacrat.

We are to cut spending on schools and other educational facilities, but still continue to import thosands of immigants whose children will add to the burden on our already overstretched edycational establishments.

We are to reduce the size of the fighting forces while continuing to featherbed the drones in the Ministry of Hot Air Defence.

We are… I give up. Time, for once, to take a leaf out of the French livre and take to the streets.

Kwotes

Here’s something to while away the time while we wait for Boa’s ‘who is iT’ 😉

All these quotes are from a game that I’ve been playing for 18 years now, I did win once but winning isn’t the object 😉

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Yes, I know the answers but PLEASE don’t quote me. I’ve been playing ‘Civilization‘ since the early days (1993), it’s the only game that I have on my computer, I’ve progressed from CivI, to CivII, to CivNet and now Civ IV, I’m still hopeless at it, I live in hope!

Discrimination is Necessary

In a radio interview this morning it was alleged that Britain has forgotten how to develop strategic planning in defence and security. The interviewee told us that the Civil Service College has reduced training in strategic thinking from a six-month course to a one-day module. The allegation has the ring of truth, and not simply in defence and security.

It appears to me that British thinking is plagued by short-termism, with policy initiatives being entirely reactive to latest events. There is little sign that anyone is thinking of where the country should be in the longer run: twenty or thirty years’ time. Why is this? A clue lies in the present obsession with the obscure notion of ‘fairness’. It seems that every initiative becomes swamped in debate on whether it is fair to this or that group. In these debates the word ‘discrimination’ is commonly used in its newly pejorative sense.

Well, long term strategic thinking demands discrimination. If the country continues on its reactive, egalitarian course the future will be determined by the loudest voices, rather than by a vision of where and what we wish to be. Britain must learn afresh to discriminate in numerous fields. In education it is important that children from poorer homes have access to higher education, but it is arguably more important to ensure that graduates can find gainful employment without having to emigrate. Such a future is not assured if we treat all degree courses as equally worthy.

It is economic madness to pretend that a degree in media studies or visual arts is as important to the nation as one in material science or engineering. People with the latter qualifications can ensure that Britain competes in tomorrow’s industrial world. They are the people who can ensure that others are able to indulge in the arts. Britain needs a diverse manufacturing base if it is to remain a developed economy, and it needs politicians who are prepared to discriminate in their policies to bring such a future about. Nigel Lawson was clearly wrong to discount the importance of manufacturing.

Certain degree courses should be financed entirely by government, and certain industries should receive discriminatory preferences to ensure that those young people with the preferred qualifications do not have to go abroad to find work. The alternative is to have a poorer future for Britain as a whole.

Sterilising Drug Addicts…

This morning’s DT carried a report on a heroin addict in the UK who accepted an offer from Project Prevention, an American Charity, to undergo sterilisation, for a reward of £200. They have apparently already paid 3,500 addicts in the States to undergo similar procedures, on a voluntary basis.
The usual suspects leapt up and down – morally reprehensible – social engineering – exploiting vulnerable people, etc., etc. “Women who use drugs can access all types of contraception free on the NHS, including a number of ‘long-term’ options” (i.e. sterilisation)
Given the near certainty of passing on their addictions to their children whilst in the womb, it seems to me to be an extraordinarily cheap way of bringing the vicious cycle to an end, or at least reducing it substantially.
The fact that drug addicts can access contraception for free on the NHS, clearly is not working, whereas a small cash incentive may well ignite their initiative and save the rest of us a fortune in the treatment cost of future generations of involuntary addicts, created thus, in the womb, without any choice in the matter. I am convinced that a cost/benefit analysis would come out clearly in favour of voluntary sterilisation for drug addicts being available with a reward of a suitable sum…

The Archers and others

I have been listening to ‘The Archers’ on and off for years. There was a very brief time, when the boys were small, when I would actually have both of them in bed by three minutes past seven and this would be the time to start again in the kitchen for the adult meal preparation, just as the music started. Then I would feel a certain sense of achievement. (The eldest would usually choose that moment to appear at the kitchen door and ask for a drink, complain he couldn’t sleep, or that he had ear-ache etc.) Continue reading “The Archers and others”