Look – and please do remember that I have a fervent dislike for our Prime Minister – there’s no way we’re going to go down the same limp-wristed route as the UK.
If our High Court decides to make an interpretative ruling that effectively negates the intentions of a law passed by our elected government, we’ll change the wording of that law to make it crystal clear to the judiciary who is actually in charge of our nation. And it ain’t the Chief Justice.
Although the legislation has not yet been passed, Juliar has today convinced her cabinet and the Labor caucus to support her in the introduction of the requisite alterations to the Migration Act.
She has, sensibly and pragmatically, declared that the changes will not define any particular solution to our immigration problems, but will clarify the undisputed right of the current executive to take such actions as it considers necessary, irrespective of foreign legislation or the High Court’s view of our obligations under any foreign legislation to which we may be a signatory. This should make it politically viable for Abbott and the opposition to support the amendments.
Continue reading “Juliar to put the High Court in its place”


It is rare to find Sipu and Janus agreeing; it is almost miraculous for me to agree with both of them. But on this occasion I have to say that they have a point. Such a fundamental point that our honoured leader, Boadicea, might even consider it for inclusion in her site guidelines. They have chimed a chord, they have struck the right note, they have sung in harmony.
You must be logged in to post a comment.