Flax

September 10, 2016 Leave a comment Go to comments

flax

Ain’t that pretty?

Advertisements
Categories: Gardening, Nature, Photography
  1. September 10, 2016 at 9:01 am

    Det er faktiskt en hyggelig land!

  2. September 10, 2016 at 10:46 am

    Pedant alert! ‘Et’ land, dreng!! 😎

  3. September 10, 2016 at 12:48 pm

    I realised that “after” I ticked “post comment”. I will force myself to listen to Aqua’s “Barbie Girl” 20 times as penance.

  4. September 10, 2016 at 3:51 pm

    (English is so much easier…)

  5. September 10, 2016 at 4:15 pm

    Janus: Your wrong and eye dont agree with ewe english aint no ez language y is it that eye think its ez?

  6. September 10, 2016 at 6:32 pm

    Ich bin ein Berliner….or a donut made for dunkin. I see today that Tom Wolfe of ‘Bonfire of the vanities’ fame is rubbishing Noam Chomsky’s theories about the origin of language, that is what were the mecahnisms (if any) by which man found out how to communicate by voice. OK, but what’s that got to do with the price of fish?

  7. O Zangado
    September 11, 2016 at 7:54 am

    Ahem…….

    The Chaos

    OZ

  8. September 11, 2016 at 9:26 am

    Nice, OZ! No probs then.

  9. September 11, 2016 at 10:00 am

    Animals communicate by sound.
    Also certain words sound as they mean. For example: smooth, rough, gurgle, screech and sleekit. I also like wersh and dreach which cannot sound like their meaning, but certainly convey it.

  10. September 11, 2016 at 5:21 pm

    Ah yes, onomatopeia! 😛

  11. September 11, 2016 at 6:23 pm

    What’s interesting is that those words that mimic soubds are different in different languages. Miaou, woof and neigh are only the Brit versions.

  12. September 11, 2016 at 7:40 pm

    Janus: you mean Chomsky’s innateness of language theory? I’m very familiar with it as I’ve co-taught a Linguistics course since 2009. So far there has been no credible challenge to it.

  13. September 11, 2016 at 7:51 pm

    No, maybe because it’s a statement of the blleeding obvious using fancy words. ‘Man has the innate ability to speak.’ It doesn’t take us much further, does it? The question is how did Man make rhe jump from animal noises to structured language.

  14. September 11, 2016 at 8:08 pm

    But only if people are exposed to language and start speaking by a certain age. After, say, 14 it becomes almost impossible to start speaking. One suspects it is a product of evolution. People have by far the most well-developed brains. Having the greatest ability to communicate is thus no great wonder.

  15. September 11, 2016 at 8:38 pm

    Chomsky claims to explain the process of babies learning to speak. He says we have the building blocks in our genes. Yes, what else? How did those genes make the jump from animal to human? That’s still a mystery, imho.

  16. September 11, 2016 at 8:40 pm

    I agree with you, Janus. Many things are simply arbitrary. There’s no real reason why we made the evolutionary jump while pigs or kangaroos did not.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Add your Comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: