How many times?

The Oscar Pistorius show is back for a re-run. It made fascinating telly the first time, combining the salty ingredients of celebrity, disabled sport, gun mania and the South African judiciary. But its story-line was flawed, allowing the anti-hero to escape with a soft sentence.

Common-sense prevailed though when it came round again. People who fire guns into small rooms, suspecting they are occupied, know they can kill –dolus eventualis. And Oscar did just that.

Now it’s round three, a determined recycling of the evidence for the benefit of a court that obviously can’t read transcripts too well. Does every murderer in SA get such considerate, elaborate treatment? I hope so but I doubt it.

  1. June 14, 2016 at 8:40 am

    I have no words to describe how uninterested I am in this subject.

  2. June 14, 2016 at 9:38 am

    That’s allowed, Jazz! 😳

  3. Boadicea
    June 14, 2016 at 11:50 am

    It has become almost terminally boring!

  4. sheona
    June 15, 2016 at 8:51 am

    But there’s a new slant this time – depression. Will Pistorius be doing an Ernest Saunders on us?

  5. Boadicea
    June 15, 2016 at 11:46 am

    Just another example of how money perverts Justice.

  6. June 15, 2016 at 6:05 pm

    I don’t think the tear-jerking defence has won. OP has failed to prove his remorse by explaining his mindset when he fired the gun. We’ll see how the chips fall on 6th July.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Add your Comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: