7 thoughts on “More pure scientific proof of global warming”
Sorry, of course I mean “climate change”. Hang on, it isn’t showing that either. Hmmm. Ah yes it does – it has been wetter every year for the last umpteen. Hence the hosepipe bans and the increase in the price of water. Err, no, not that either. Bugger. I need another idea to tax the masses….anyone?
😆
I thought that one of my finer moments recently was when I suggested “A shower of meteorologists” as a collective verb.
Noun, that is, urp!
Hehe indeed! I feel a bit sorry for the weather forecasters really, especially those in the UK. Weather patterns are obviously subject to the laws of physics, but on a strip of land surrounded by water and strong prevailing winds, it is always going to be a bit of guess work, no matter how clever the computers!
Cuprum, we’d have nothing to talk about if the weather held no surprises.
Even the Met Office and the BBC can’t ignore Mr Reality knocking on the door for much longer – or can they?
Sorry, of course I mean “climate change”. Hang on, it isn’t showing that either. Hmmm. Ah yes it does – it has been wetter every year for the last umpteen. Hence the hosepipe bans and the increase in the price of water. Err, no, not that either. Bugger. I need another idea to tax the masses….anyone?
😆
I thought that one of my finer moments recently was when I suggested “A shower of meteorologists” as a collective verb.
Noun, that is, urp!
Hehe indeed! I feel a bit sorry for the weather forecasters really, especially those in the UK. Weather patterns are obviously subject to the laws of physics, but on a strip of land surrounded by water and strong prevailing winds, it is always going to be a bit of guess work, no matter how clever the computers!
Cuprum, we’d have nothing to talk about if the weather held no surprises.
Even the Met Office and the BBC can’t ignore Mr Reality knocking on the door for much longer – or can they?