First, the why-do-we-bother. First and foremost it’s a business requirement. We protect our brand reputation just like any other brand owner. We produce products that our consumers like and build brand loyalty by ensuring product quality. If a consumer has a bad experience with one of our products, he’s likely to chuck it and switch to a competitor. Secondly, our product is consumed. You know what is in a genuine product – no matter what you might think of the dread habit, think chocolate bars, or baby milk powder if it helps, the principles are the same – but as you will have seen, if the product is produced in filthy conditions in an abandoned chicken farm… Thirdly, counterfeits cut into our sales – it is unfair competition.
Anti-counterfeit operations are also a common good. The penalties for smuggling cigarettes – whether genuine or counterfeit, btw – are laughable in a way that the penalties for smuggling weapons, say, are not. If you consider that the profit on a 20′ container-load of counterfeit cigarettes can be around 350k US, and 200k or so for smuggled genuine product, a 10k US fine is just overheads. Money made on smuggling cigarettes is also used to finance other crime, as well, as I’ve mentioned before.
Then there’s a big – no, make that freakin’ enormous – new reason to spend money on anti-illicit trade operations. The major international cigarette companies have signed an agreement with the EUSSR which obliges us to pay tax on any seizure of 50,000 or more – genuine – cigarettes found to have been illegally transported for sale into any EUSSR country. This means that we pay tax on the product twice, once in the country of origin, and again in the country of seizure, , unless, of course, the products were intended for duty-free sale. But there’s more. If the total number of seized cigarettes exceeds 400,000, we pay twice the tax – and it goes up in increments until we could end up paying four times the tax!
Counterfeit cigarettes do not count towards the totals, of course, and neither do cigarettes that we can prove have been sold by us, or our agents, to retailers as we can clearly, no matter how good our business controls in the supply chain might be, have no control over what individual retailers do with the cigarettes they stock.
So, all seizures are notified to the brand owner – this happened before the agreement with the USSR, btw, as the major manufacturers have been co-operating with the authorities to reduce smuggling for many years – and we have to go and inspect each seizure and account for them all, if we can; counterfeit, sold at retail or duty-free, to try to limit the penalty tax bill.
How is it done? All producers of branded goods have some means of identifying the genuine article. The pattern on a Gucci handbag, for example, is extremely precise. The recipe for a chocolate bar or a tin of baby milk-powder is similarly precise, as is the design, colours and even shape of the tin or other container. There are also product codes, distribution codes and other identifiers for each SKU, (stock-keeping unit) that a manufacturer produces and these can change quite quickly as SKUs are produced by different shifts or sourced from different places – they can also, of course, be changed deliberately at intervals to keep them unique and make life harder for counterfeiters. Manufacturers usually have some sort of covert marking system that will make a definite – and legally defensible – identification of genuine product possible. Cigarettes are no different. Obviously, I am not going to detail here, in plain sight, exactly what we look for, you’ll have to take my word for it that we can differentiate between counterfeit and genuine product. To do it, of course, we have to examine all of the goods. If the product is still in ‘outers,’ cartons or shrink-wrapped blocks of 200, it is much easier and the inspection is much quicker. If the goods are in a heap of single packs, the process is much more time-consuming as each pack has to be examined individually. Even if the goods are still in their outers, each one must be checked as the wise-guys have taken to unpacking the outers, mixing packs of genuine and counterfeit goods into blocks of 200 and re-wrapping them.
So, all of that was the cause of my 800 km round trip, five locations in three long days and something on the order of half-a-million sticks examined. If you’re still reading, you must have found this mildly interesting, at least 🙂
Have you got a light boy? (Sorry, don’t know what me say that, it just came to mind, was there a song with those words?) Sorry Bravo, I’ve gone off track a bit with your post.
And you haven’t yet mentioned the tax loss to whichever country you happen to be in!
I have a lot of sympathy for the ‘illegal operators.’ Bravo, you would make a fortune down here, Zim products are on sale on the streets down here at R6.00 per pack of 20.
That’s less than US$1 per pack.
Good for Zim, they get a bit of much needed foreign exchange and the S.A. consumer gets a reasonably priced product.
And a healthy dose of contaminants. I’ll let you into a trick of the trade – none of the procedures for testing’identifying counterfeit or smuggled goods involves smoking them. Guess why?
On the tax loss, you are dead right – considering that Governments make, on average, four times as much from each pack of cigarettes as the manufacturers! (And if you’re in somewhere like UK, it’s twelve times!)
PS Val, the singing postman from Norfolk 🙂
Nobody would buy counterfeit if the real thing wasn’t overpriced or over taxed in the first place.
Law of diminishing returns.
Bravo,
I know the tobacco game, perhaps better than the manufacturers ’cause I’m with the end users every single day of my life. you mention ” a healthy dose of contaminants “, ha, big deal. Rather like suggesting that it’s not the power of the nuclear bomb that will get you but the fallout!
It’s all about budget, cost, budget, cost, budget and cost, the consumer knows that the product is going to kill them, the vast majority here couldn’t care less if it’s 75, 65 or 55, if they can save ten (or twenty) Rand a day that amounts to a huge improvement to the household budget.
A lot of the problems down here by the way are illegal cigarettes from Eastern Europe (Marlboro Lights and Peter Stuyvesant), the illegal Zim stuff isn’t branded as a ‘rip off’ but has it’s own identity i.e. Savannah!
CO. Exactly so.
Soutie, ‘I know the tobacco game, perhaps better than the manufacturers’ No, you don’t. By contaminants I mean real contaminants – rodent/domestic animal refuse, and like that. We used to source a lot of tobacco from Zim, back in the day.
Thanks for this Bravo… Christina is right – but Governments will never see it that way.
Yes, thank you, Bravo. Interesting.
Having just got back from my little trip to Africa today, I did notice that whilst in SA, Zambia and Botswana no matter what brand of cigaret I smoked they all tasted the same. 🙂
Welcome back, Toc, look forward to hearing all about it in due course.
What brands?
bravo –
So are you a smoker yourself? And yes, I found your post more than “mildly interesting” – thanks!
Thanks Squarepeg, and yes, I am – of 40 -odd years. Still running my 5Km of a morning. 🙂